These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is usually justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears as well as a new system is set in its place.
However, decisions rendered through the Supreme Court of the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues of the Constitution and federal legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Plainly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a transfer into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, on the other hand, supplies financial relief by placing an employee in the higher pay scale, without modifying their career duties or position. It's a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same pay back scale for a long time, particularly when they deficiency alternatives for promotion. Upgradation is a policy Instrument used to relieve the hardship of prolonged-term stagnation. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts will not have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments with the lower courts.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it is unclear how it relates to any offered situation, usually rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers and also the circumstances of the case at hand. These decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, such as the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, providing a worthwhile resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons possessing their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and the case shall be decided with the competent court of law if pending. Read more
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the broader legal principles.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion could be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual duration of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for becoming entitled for being viewed as for promotion to some higher quality, of course, isn't without logic as being the officer who is to begin with inducted to a particular post needs to serve over the reported post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to serve the public inside of a befitting method.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does more info not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.